<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aren&#8217;t Dogpiles Supposed to Stink?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/arent-dogpiles-supposed-to-stink/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/arent-dogpiles-supposed-to-stink/</link>
	<description>Search Marketing Information to Render Your Competition Powerless!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill at Houston Real Estate</title>
		<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/arent-dogpiles-supposed-to-stink/#comment-172957</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill at Houston Real Estate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 04:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/?p=2013#comment-172957</guid>
		<description>Its wierd I am sure some vp at dogpile was like &#34;I have great way to increase revenue&#34;.  What they dont realize I guess is how they are going to drive visitors away.   I had a friend that used dogpile once they realized them ads in the organic they quit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its wierd I am sure some vp at dogpile was like &quot;I have great way to increase revenue&quot;.  What they dont realize I guess is how they are going to drive visitors away.   I had a friend that used dogpile once they realized them ads in the organic they quit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/arent-dogpiles-supposed-to-stink/#comment-138949</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 20:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/?p=2013#comment-138949</guid>
		<description>Hey Tummblr - 

You're right about advertisers wanting to be buried in organic results, that users shouldn't be fooled and a good point about non-sophisticated users being tricked. These are all reasons why the major Engines have taken to displaying sponsored links as &lt;i&gt;sponsored&lt;/i&gt;.

It could be argued that meta engines like Dogpile aren't held to the same constraints that the major search engines are, although Dogpile does label the results as &lt;i&gt;sponsored&lt;/i&gt; (subtle tho it may be). 

Thanks for the comment. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tummblr - </p>
<p>You&#8217;re right about advertisers wanting to be buried in organic results, that users shouldn&#8217;t be fooled and a good point about non-sophisticated users being tricked. These are all reasons why the major Engines have taken to displaying sponsored links as <i>sponsored</i>.</p>
<p>It could be argued that meta engines like Dogpile aren&#8217;t held to the same constraints that the major search engines are, although Dogpile does label the results as <i>sponsored</i> (subtle tho it may be). </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment. <img src='http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tummblr</title>
		<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/arent-dogpiles-supposed-to-stink/#comment-138934</link>
		<dc:creator>Tummblr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 19:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/?p=2013#comment-138934</guid>
		<description>Most advertisers would probably love to be buried amongst organic listings.  But isn't this a pretty blatant way of trying to deceive non-sophisticated users?  It's just like sites that make the shade of the sponsored links box extremely similar to the rest of the page's background (*cough* AOL *cough*).  Users should never be fooled into clicking an ad because it looks just like an organic link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most advertisers would probably love to be buried amongst organic listings.  But isn&#8217;t this a pretty blatant way of trying to deceive non-sophisticated users?  It&#8217;s just like sites that make the shade of the sponsored links box extremely similar to the rest of the page&#8217;s background (*cough* AOL *cough*).  Users should never be fooled into clicking an ad because it looks just like an organic link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/arent-dogpiles-supposed-to-stink/#comment-138062</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 14:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/?p=2013#comment-138062</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Angela. I agree, I like what Dogpile has done, if the advertiser isn't happy about having their ad inline with natural results because they're afraid they're going to get irrelevant clicks, then I think they're forgetting what they're doing - advertising! 

Ad copy should flow smoothly and invite interest for learning more or purchasing that product - &lt;b&gt;CLICK&lt;/b&gt;. Truth, meta descriptions should be doing the same thing, they &lt;i&gt; are advertising.&lt;/i&gt;

(As for AOL, well, I can only say it was 1996, and a &lt;i&gt;very long time ago&lt;/i&gt; forgive me?  ;))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Angela. I agree, I like what Dogpile has done, if the advertiser isn&#8217;t happy about having their ad inline with natural results because they&#8217;re afraid they&#8217;re going to get irrelevant clicks, then I think they&#8217;re forgetting what they&#8217;re doing - advertising! </p>
<p>Ad copy should flow smoothly and invite interest for learning more or purchasing that product - <b>CLICK</b>. Truth, meta descriptions should be doing the same thing, they <i> are advertising.</i></p>
<p>(As for AOL, well, I can only say it was 1996, and a <i>very long time ago</i> forgive me?  ;))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/arent-dogpiles-supposed-to-stink/#comment-137938</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 04:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/?p=2013#comment-137938</guid>
		<description>I loved Dogpile back in the day.. but I never got into AOL. ;) What you've pointed out is really interesting, and I agree that good copy always 'sells'. I think it's great that Dogpile has done this actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved Dogpile back in the day.. but I never got into AOL. <img src='http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> What you&#8217;ve pointed out is really interesting, and I agree that good copy always &#8217;sells&#8217;. I think it&#8217;s great that Dogpile has done this actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
