<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Optimizer Not Just for PPC. Who Knew?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/google-optimizer-not-just-for-ppc-who-knew/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/google-optimizer-not-just-for-ppc-who-knew/</link>
	<description>Search Marketing Information to Render Your Competition Powerless!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:12:08 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/google-optimizer-not-just-for-ppc-who-knew/comment-page-1/#comment-88666</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/?p=1660#comment-88666</guid>
		<description>Hi Zach --

You hit the nail on the head:
The page did not fit the design of the site, and had no navigation. The alternate page had no organic optimization - in fact it has very little beyond brief details and a call to action button.

What I have done, is create duplicate ads, each pointing to a different landing page. In this way, I am still able to do my A/B testing. I just wanted to use the Optimizer to analyze the results for me. 

It works. The identical ads have slightly different Click through rates (difference of 1%), and the original page has a better Conversion Rate. Time to pause the low performing landing page in favor of the better ...

Thanks for the comment.

D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Zach &#8211;</p>
<p>You hit the nail on the head:<br />
The page did not fit the design of the site, and had no navigation. The alternate page had no organic optimization &#8211; in fact it has very little beyond brief details and a call to action button.</p>
<p>What I have done, is create duplicate ads, each pointing to a different landing page. In this way, I am still able to do my A/B testing. I just wanted to use the Optimizer to analyze the results for me. </p>
<p>It works. The identical ads have slightly different Click through rates (difference of 1%), and the original page has a better Conversion Rate. Time to pause the low performing landing page in favor of the better &#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
<p>D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/google-optimizer-not-just-for-ppc-who-knew/comment-page-1/#comment-88645</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/?p=1660#comment-88645</guid>
		<description>Why would you turn it off? I&#039;m guessing the page didn&#039;t fit into the site, like no navigation, or different design, or it was a long sales letter.

If not, why wouldn&#039;t you want to test your organic traffic as well? I want to make the most of all my traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you turn it off? I&#8217;m guessing the page didn&#8217;t fit into the site, like no navigation, or different design, or it was a long sales letter.</p>
<p>If not, why wouldn&#8217;t you want to test your organic traffic as well? I want to make the most of all my traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
