Comments on: Inbox to Trash in 0.0036 Seconds http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/inbox-to-trash-in-00036-seconds/ Search Marketing Information to Render Your Competition Powerless! Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:24:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Stoney deGeyter http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/inbox-to-trash-in-00036-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-466 Stoney deGeyter Sat, 11 Mar 2006 04:50:11 +0000 http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/inbox-to-trash-in-00036-seconds/#comment-466 Nicolas, it takes a big person to admit their mistakes publicly like this. I know I've made my own share of them. But I hope that by "concentrating on one-way links" means that you're going to 1) stop spamming and 2) do your research before you email someone for a link exchange. One-way, reciprocal, three-way links, it doesnt matter really, it was your technique that sucks. Nicolas, it takes a big person to admit their mistakes publicly like this. I know I’ve made my own share of them. But I hope that by “concentrating on one-way links” means that you’re going to 1) stop spamming and 2) do your research before you email someone for a link exchange. One-way, reciprocal, three-way links, it doesnt matter really, it was your technique that sucks.

]]> By: nicolas http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/inbox-to-trash-in-00036-seconds/comment-page-1/#comment-465 nicolas Sat, 11 Mar 2006 02:02:05 +0000 http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/inbox-to-trash-in-00036-seconds/#comment-465 Hi, yes you right this is dumb... It was actually a try, and seing the results here is not great at all. We're concentrating on one way links now. Thanks for the link ;-), sorry for the dumb mail. Nicolas Hi, yes you right this is dumb… It was actually a try, and seing the results here is not great at all. We’re concentrating on one way links now.

Thanks for the link ;-) , sorry for the dumb mail.

Nicolas

]]>