<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Seomoz Going to Borrow From the Affiliate Playbook?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/is-seomoz-going-to-borrow-from-the-affiliate-playbook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/is-seomoz-going-to-borrow-from-the-affiliate-playbook/</link>
	<description>Search Marketing Information to Render Your Competition Powerless!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:24:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Adkins</title>
		<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/is-seomoz-going-to-borrow-from-the-affiliate-playbook/comment-page-1/#comment-79323</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Adkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/?p=1646#comment-79323</guid>
		<description>Rand! so you&#039;re not going to strangle me! whew!

I totally get it that some purchases require lots of info, and that there&#039;s a reason all these affiliate sites use the format - because it works!

I do worry that the user experience will be compromised, though, so I can&#039;t wait to see (blog about) what you come up with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand! so you&#8217;re not going to strangle me! whew!</p>
<p>I totally get it that some purchases require lots of info, and that there&#8217;s a reason all these affiliate sites use the format &#8211; because it works!</p>
<p>I do worry that the user experience will be compromised, though, so I can&#8217;t wait to see (blog about) what you come up with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randfish</title>
		<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/is-seomoz-going-to-borrow-from-the-affiliate-playbook/comment-page-1/#comment-79183</link>
		<dc:creator>randfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 03:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/?p=1646#comment-79183</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s so true! I hate the fact that those long form landing pages convert well. I think they&#039;re... well... slimy. But, at the same time, I think we&#039;re going to see a long form page win the contest, and then it will be up to us to find something more balanced and more in line with our culture that&#039;s equally successful at converting people. It&#039;s a challenge, but never fear - I totally feel your pain on this one :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s so true! I hate the fact that those long form landing pages convert well. I think they&#8217;re&#8230; well&#8230; slimy. But, at the same time, I think we&#8217;re going to see a long form page win the contest, and then it will be up to us to find something more balanced and more in line with our culture that&#8217;s equally successful at converting people. It&#8217;s a challenge, but never fear &#8211; I totally feel your pain on this one <img src='http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

