<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Salary Takers vs. Salary Makers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/salary-takers-vs-salary-makers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/salary-takers-vs-salary-makers/</link>
	<description>Search Marketing Information to Render Your Competition Powerless!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:05:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/salary-takers-vs-salary-makers/comment-page-1/#comment-46747</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 16:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/?p=1180#comment-46747</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d have to think too hard this morning to come up with an accurate analogy, but there are companies are takers and makers in much the same way.

Some companies expect employees to give-give-give and are unwilling to give back to the employees. The company just takes everything they can get from their staff.

Such companies instill the take-take-take philosophy that &lt;i&gt;creates&lt;/i&gt; salary takers. The company TAKES from the employee, the employee TAKES from the company.

That said, I agree with Stoney saying True salary makers work for companies that look after the needs of the employee as well as the company. I’d go further to day that if a company wants more salary &lt;i&gt;makers&lt;/i&gt;, the company needs to do more for their employees than &lt;i&gt;take&lt;/i&gt; all they can get. 

There are Salary Takers and Salary Makers in every company - but I think the company has the ability to convert some &lt;i&gt;takers&lt;/i&gt; into &lt;i&gt;makers&lt;/i&gt;.

At the risk of sounding like a suck up ...  I&#039;d say Stoney has a company that looks out for its employees.

Diana</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d have to think too hard this morning to come up with an accurate analogy, but there are companies are takers and makers in much the same way.</p>
<p>Some companies expect employees to give-give-give and are unwilling to give back to the employees. The company just takes everything they can get from their staff.</p>
<p>Such companies instill the take-take-take philosophy that <i>creates</i> salary takers. The company TAKES from the employee, the employee TAKES from the company.</p>
<p>That said, I agree with Stoney saying True salary makers work for companies that look after the needs of the employee as well as the company. I’d go further to day that if a company wants more salary <i>makers</i>, the company needs to do more for their employees than <i>take</i> all they can get. </p>
<p>There are Salary Takers and Salary Makers in every company &#8211; but I think the company has the ability to convert some <i>takers</i> into <i>makers</i>.</p>
<p>At the risk of sounding like a suck up &#8230;  I&#8217;d say Stoney has a company that looks out for its employees.</p>
<p>Diana</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
