<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Single-Serve vs. All You Can Eat SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/single-serve-vs-all-you-can-eat-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/single-serve-vs-all-you-can-eat-seo/</link>
	<description>Search Marketing Information to Render Your Competition Powerless!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoney deGeyter</title>
		<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/single-serve-vs-all-you-can-eat-seo/#comment-4612</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoney deGeyter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/?p=866#comment-4612</guid>
		<description>Thanks igor! Of course, we don't subscribe the the "maintenance and reports" version of the ongoing contract. There really needs to be much more than that. What is "maintenance"? Is it link building? Great, then say so. Is it reports? OK, Cool. What else? Is it link building and tweaking but only when rankings drop? Well, that's OK if you're not paying a lot, but that's still single-serve to me. All you can eat means you're constantly going out and optimizing for more keywords every month. And then some more again and more again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks igor! Of course, we don&#8217;t subscribe the the &#8220;maintenance and reports&#8221; version of the ongoing contract. There really needs to be much more than that. What is &#8220;maintenance&#8221;? Is it link building? Great, then say so. Is it reports? OK, Cool. What else? Is it link building and tweaking but only when rankings drop? Well, that&#8217;s OK if you&#8217;re not paying a lot, but that&#8217;s still single-serve to me. All you can eat means you&#8217;re constantly going out and optimizing for more keywords every month. And then some more again and more again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor M. (BizMord Marketing Blog)</title>
		<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/single-serve-vs-all-you-can-eat-seo/#comment-4607</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor M. (BizMord Marketing Blog)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/?p=866#comment-4607</guid>
		<description>Stoney ... the choice between the 2 is complicated when you speak to many SEO companies. With this post you make it clear and easy to make a decision. If I was a client I would chose the #2 (All you can eat). 

Problem is ... many SEO companies offer this at $400 to $1,500 month and when you ask them specifically what will be done you can translate their "blah blah" to  "duh, well, umm, reports!"

You're right. SEO is an "ongoing" process and even if you achieve great results for a client, with time their rankings will drop because while they relax, their competition won't.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stoney &#8230; the choice between the 2 is complicated when you speak to many SEO companies. With this post you make it clear and easy to make a decision. If I was a client I would chose the #2 (All you can eat). </p>
<p>Problem is &#8230; many SEO companies offer this at $400 to $1,500 month and when you ask them specifically what will be done you can translate their &#8220;blah blah&#8221; to  &#8220;duh, well, umm, reports!&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right. SEO is an &#8220;ongoing&#8221; process and even if you achieve great results for a client, with time their rankings will drop because while they relax, their competition won&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
