<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Length Some People Would Go&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/the-length-some-people-would-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/the-length-some-people-would-go/</link>
	<description>Search Marketing Information to Render Your Competition Powerless!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:24:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: OCC Search Enging Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/the-length-some-people-would-go/comment-page-1/#comment-43112</link>
		<dc:creator>OCC Search Enging Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 14:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/?p=1384#comment-43112</guid>
		<description>Rob, I agree the keyword &quot;free&quot; gives me mixed feelings.  On the one hand it&#039;s very a very popular search term, on the other hand is the person who is searching for &quot;free&quot; whatever going to ever buy something when they get to the site.  The end result is usually a low conversion rate, unless you&#039;re actually trying to get free users.

Another keyword that gives me fits is &quot;cheap.&quot;  Like free, it&#039;s a very popular search word, but &quot;cheap&quot; has the negative connotation of being poor quality.  So, do you really want to plaster &quot;cheap&quot; all throughout your on-page optimization elements?  The thought makes me cringe.

- Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, I agree the keyword &#8220;free&#8221; gives me mixed feelings.  On the one hand it&#8217;s very a very popular search term, on the other hand is the person who is searching for &#8220;free&#8221; whatever going to ever buy something when they get to the site.  The end result is usually a low conversion rate, unless you&#8217;re actually trying to get free users.</p>
<p>Another keyword that gives me fits is &#8220;cheap.&#8221;  Like free, it&#8217;s a very popular search word, but &#8220;cheap&#8221; has the negative connotation of being poor quality.  So, do you really want to plaster &#8220;cheap&#8221; all throughout your on-page optimization elements?  The thought makes me cringe.</p>
<p>- Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

