<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Theories in Duplicate Content Penalties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/theories-in-duplicate-content-penalties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/theories-in-duplicate-content-penalties/</link>
	<description>Search Marketing Information to Render Your Competition Powerless!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:24:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoney deGeyter</title>
		<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/theories-in-duplicate-content-penalties/comment-page-1/#comment-134488</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoney deGeyter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/?p=1995#comment-134488</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill, You&#039;re right, putting your archive settings to show summaries is a good solution. I think that with blogs search engines have done pretty well at working around the duplication issues and going straight to the posts, but its always best not to make the search engines think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill, You&#8217;re right, putting your archive settings to show summaries is a good solution. I think that with blogs search engines have done pretty well at working around the duplication issues and going straight to the posts, but its always best not to make the search engines think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/theories-in-duplicate-content-penalties/comment-page-1/#comment-134295</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 18:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/?p=1995#comment-134295</guid>
		<description>Wordpress is a major culprit for in-site duplication - post pages, category pages, date pages, tag pages and so on - and unless your template comes pre-prepped to deal with it you have to do some fiddly engineering in php to make it cool again. In fact, in the case of WP I&#039;m not sure that SEO is even the biggest problem caused by duplication - it&#039;s worse having new readers find stuff on your site via the SERPS and then have to scroll through a cat page to see what they wanted to read.

[Just so nobody&#039;s in suspense here, you can get plugins to fix this, though in my experience they&#039;re a bit iffy. Best way is to set all the archive pages to only show post summaries.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WordPress is a major culprit for in-site duplication &#8211; post pages, category pages, date pages, tag pages and so on &#8211; and unless your template comes pre-prepped to deal with it you have to do some fiddly engineering in php to make it cool again. In fact, in the case of WP I&#8217;m not sure that SEO is even the biggest problem caused by duplication &#8211; it&#8217;s worse having new readers find stuff on your site via the SERPS and then have to scroll through a cat page to see what they wanted to read.</p>
<p>[Just so nobody's in suspense here, you can get plugins to fix this, though in my experience they're a bit iffy. Best way is to set all the archive pages to only show post summaries.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

