<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MSN Converts! What That Means to You (And Possibly Google Too!)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/why-msn-converts-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/why-msn-converts-better/</link>
	<description>Search Marketing Information to Render Your Competition Powerless!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:05:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Stoney deGeyter</title>
		<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/why-msn-converts-better/comment-page-1/#comment-4820</link>
		<dc:creator>Stoney deGeyter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/?p=876#comment-4820</guid>
		<description>In terms of optimizing for MSN, well, we don&#039;t. We optimize period, but primarily go for rankings on Google. Doing that usually also gets us good rankings on MSN. One isn&#039;t necessarily at the expense of the other. 

It might be the audience that gets the better conversions, but that doesn&#039;t mean the other engines can&#039;t learn something that can help them improve conversion rates for us as well (not that they really care). If MSN&#039;s audience is spending more time reading the results, and that creates better conversions for the businesses, if I was Google I&#039;d see what should be changed to give searchers more to read in the results. Again, I say longer descriptions!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of optimizing for MSN, well, we don&#8217;t. We optimize period, but primarily go for rankings on Google. Doing that usually also gets us good rankings on MSN. One isn&#8217;t necessarily at the expense of the other. </p>
<p>It might be the audience that gets the better conversions, but that doesn&#8217;t mean the other engines can&#8217;t learn something that can help them improve conversion rates for us as well (not that they really care). If MSN&#8217;s audience is spending more time reading the results, and that creates better conversions for the businesses, if I was Google I&#8217;d see what should be changed to give searchers more to read in the results. Again, I say longer descriptions!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor M. (BizMord Marketing Blog)</title>
		<link>http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/why-msn-converts-better/comment-page-1/#comment-4812</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor M. (BizMord Marketing Blog)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polepositionmarketing.com/emp/?p=876#comment-4812</guid>
		<description>Stoney, I think the reason why MSN has a higher conversion rate is mainly because of the people who use it. 

In terms of relevance on MSN ..... so far I&#039;ve seen MSN do very well with the results they show. (I&#039;m still not a Microsoft fanatic).

What else can we enjoy about MSN? It&#039;s much easier to optimize for it but have you noticed that by using methods of optimization for MSN, you compromise your ranking on Google? I&#039;ve seen this happen even though all this is a &quot;case by case&quot; / &quot;industry&quot; basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stoney, I think the reason why MSN has a higher conversion rate is mainly because of the people who use it. </p>
<p>In terms of relevance on MSN &#8230;.. so far I&#8217;ve seen MSN do very well with the results they show. (I&#8217;m still not a Microsoft fanatic).</p>
<p>What else can we enjoy about MSN? It&#8217;s much easier to optimize for it but have you noticed that by using methods of optimization for MSN, you compromise your ranking on Google? I&#8217;ve seen this happen even though all this is a &#8220;case by case&#8221; / &#8220;industry&#8221; basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
